• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
(888) 312-1744
APL Logo

APL nextED Academic Operations Platform

Bringing Academic Teams Together

  • Features
    • Features Overview
    • Faculty
    • Courses
    • Contracts and Compensation
    • Reporting
    • Professional Development
    • Recruiting
    • Implementation and Integration
  • Who We Help
    • Faculty
    • Academic Leadership
    • Executive Leadership
    • Staff and Administrators
    • Academic Data and Reporting
    • Teaching Support Resources
    • IT
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Testimonials
    • Value
  • Resources
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Accreditors Standards
    • Assessments And Grades
    • Best Practices For Teaching
    • Education Technology And Products
    • Higher Education Terms
    • Managing A Class
    • Preparing For The Return to Campus
    • Teaching Online Courses
    • Today’s Students
    • Trends In Higher Education
    • Understanding Your Faculty
  • Contact
  • Login
    • Faculty Users
    • Institution Users
  • Book a Meeting
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Rethinking Procedure for Plagiarism Cases

APL nextED Marketing Team · March 24, 2020 ·

Adjunct-Professor-Link---Rethinking-Procedure-for-Plagiarism-Cases

At the end of October, an undergraduate student from Suffolk University was accused of plagiarism for the use of the word “hence.” Scrawled next to the word in question was the sentence: “This is not your word.” The student, Tiffany Martinez, would later confide: “I am hurting because my professor assumed that the only way I could produce content as good as this was to ‘cut and paste.’ I am hurting because for a brief moment I believed them” (Jaschik, 2016). This incident has incited some necessary self-reflection in the realm of higher education on proper teaching methods for a diverse group of students. Neglected, however, is a broader conversation of how incidents such as these require rethinking how academia handles plagiarism.

The age-old “trick” for detecting plagiarism is by comparing a student’s most recent writing with their previous work. While leading a workshop on plagiarism in student writing, Inside HigherEd writer, Nate Kreuter, recalls that he was taken aback when a professor insisted that possible plagiarizers should be confronted after a dramatic improvement in their work. He writes, “The implication is that instructors have some sort of intuition for what an individual student’s capabilities are. How are instructors to know an individual student’s capabilities? What if the student wrote a horrible initial paper, perhaps because of distractions unknowable to us as instructors, and subsequently got his or her act together and wrote a stellar paper?” (Kreuter, 2013). In many cases (certainly in the case of Tiffany Martinez), hasty actions have the grave potential for hurtful, unwarranted accusations.

So, when would be a necessary moment to approach students about plagiarism? Nate Kreuter insists that actions should not be taken until there is absolute proof. “I wouldn’t even consider scheduling a conference with the student about the possibility of plagiarism unless I had airtight evidence, the sort of proof that I would be willing to present to a disciplinary committee. In addition to the fact that accusing or questioning a student about plagiarism without any evidence could expose you to legal liability, the more likely problem is that after a wrongful or unsubstantiated accusation, the student will be lost to you. Forget about imparting any lessons after that conversation” (2013).

Tiffany Martinez’s case is certainly an exceptional one, as an accusation of plagiarizing a single word-“hence”-denotes serious systemic issues of underestimating a student’s capabilities. However, this is also largely in part due to the common “I know it when I see it” mentality surrounding plagiarism that has been long cherished in academia. Unless you can build a serious case against a student for plagiarizing, it is unnecessary to be confrontational in their sudden improvement, which can possibly be explained by other extraneous factors. Always take care while proceeding in plagiarism cases, as they should closely follow your institution’s policies for academic dishonesty. If you have any questions, inquire with your administration, supervisors, or academic chairs to ensure proper procedure is being taken.

For further reading:

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/10/31/latina-students-story-about-how-professor-reacted-word-hence-sets-debate-stereotypes

https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2013/07/10/essay-how-deal-and-not-obsess-over-student-plagiarism

 

< Previous
Next >

Best Practices For Teaching

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • Podcast
  • Press Releases
  • Resources
    • Accreditors Standards
    • Assessments And Grades
    • Best Practices For Operations
    • Best Practices For Teaching
    • Education Technology And Products
    • Events
    • Higher Education Terms
    • Interviewing and Hiring
    • Leadership in Higher Education
    • Managing A Class
    • Teaching Evaluations
    • Teaching Online Courses
    • Today's Students
    • Trends In Higher Education
    • Understanding Your Faculty
    • Videos
APL Logo

APL nextED, the leading academic operations platform, brings all your academic leadership together in one centralized hub to connect, collaborate and demonstrate outcomes.Get Your Demo Today!

ACE Womens Network Logo

Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
  • Podcast
  • FAQs
  • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact

Contact Us

[email protected]
(888) 312-1744
15 N. Franklin Street
Suite 100 Valparaiso, IN 46383

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Map

Copyright © 2023 – APL nextED, Inc |Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website, to show you personalized content and targeted ads, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from. By browsing our website, you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.
ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT